Online media has the potential to be a user-friendly method for improving student learning of medical screening and patient referral in physical therapy curricula. The purpose of this case report presentation is to describe educational multimedia innovations used in the “Medical Screening for Patient Referral” course at Mount Saint Mary’s University (MSMU)Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) program in Los Angeles.
Physical therapist (PT) students in their final academic year accessed 3 consecutive years of archives from a monthly online national public radio (NPR: The Larry Meiller Show) media program titled “Aches, Pains, Sprains and Strains – Talk to Your Physical Therapist.” Based on information provided by the callers, PT students determined whether callers required further medical screening in a writing assignment. Upon completion of the assignment and classroom group discussions, a face-to-face videoconferencing between one of the PTs from the NPR program and PT students was conducted to discuss the challenge of screening callers for patient referral and relevance to clinical practice.
The archived online media program was incorporated into a medical screening course with minimal faculty resources and positive student feedback. Overall, PTs on the radio media program noted 12.3% of 608 callers in 3 years required a physician referral. In addition, the majority of the callers were not examined by a physician prior to speaking with PTs.
Conclusions/Relevance to the conference theme: The Pursuit of Excellence in Physical Therapy Education
An online media program that screens callers with aches, pains, sprains, and strains may provide an additional educational strategy to reinforce decision-making skills necessary for medical screening and patient referral in physical therapy curricula. Classroom discussion with PT students and faculty are warranted to discern medical screening cases from online media program requiring a physician referral.
1.Robertson E. What’s Next? Exploring Innovation in Physical Therapy Education. Keynote presented at: Educational Leadership Conference; October 4, 2013; Portland, OR.
2.Smith A, J., Jones J, Cavanaugh C, Venn J, Wilson W. Effect of interactive multimedia on basic clinical psychomotor skill performance by physical therapist students. J Phys Ther Educ. 2006;20(2):61-67.
3.Mincer AB. The 3R method optimizes the use of student response systems in physical therapist education. J Phys Ther Educ. 2013;27(1):94-100.
4.Thiele AK, Mai JA, Post S. The student-centered classroom of the 21st century: Integrating web 2.0 applications and other technology to actively engage students. J Phys Ther Educ. 2014;28(1):80-93.
5.Boucher B, Robertson E, Wainner R, Sanders B. “Flipping” Texas State University’s physical therapist musculoskeletal curriculum: Implementation of a hybrid learning model. J Phys Ther Educ. 2013;27(3):72-77.
6.May B, P. Pauline Cerasoli lecture 2009. Are We There Yet? J Phys Ther Educ. 2009;23(2):10-14.
7.Baker C, P. Pauline Cerasoli lecture 2012. Googling and texting and browsing, oh my! Mentoring and teaching in an electronic age. J Phys Ther Educ. 2012;26(3):5-12.
8.Veneri D. The role and effectiveness of computer-assisted learning in physical therapy education: A systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011;27(4):287-298.
9.Gallagher-Lepak S, Reilly J, Killion CM. Nursing student perceptions of community in online learning. Contemporary Nurs. 2009;32:133-146.
10.Barsky E, Giustini D. Web 2.0 in physical therapy: A practical overview. Physiother Canada. 2008; 60(3): 207-215.
11.Boissonnault W, Morgan B, Buelow J. A comparison of two strategies for teaching medical screening and patient referral in a physical therapist professional degree program. J Phys Ther Educ. 2006;20(1):28-36.