Improving Teaching with a Solid Theoretical Foundation
Developing the next generation of excellent physical therapists will require educators equipped to teach more than facts and inert knowledge. As clinicians, clinical reasoning is the foundation that enables effective use of clinical skills; as educators an understanding of how learning occurs enables appropriate use of pedagogical tools and strategies. While learning is not a directly observable process, educators must structure learning experiences to address the complexity of multi-dimensional dynamic learning processes and operationalize assessments in alignment with learning goals and teaching methods. During the last decade, many resources have been dedicated to “innovation” in teaching for the health sciences. Innovation without foundation, though, may limit the effectiveness of the innovation and fail to address teaching and learning goals. In teaching, one’s implicit theories of learning influence teaching and assessment. Educators, however, are often unaware of the theories or models of learning that influence them. Further, many educators lack formal training in these models of teaching and learning. We can make teaching and learning more intentional if we identify and elucidate the theory supporting our teaching. Identification of one’s working theory can guide alignment of teaching and assessment methods. The purpose of this session is to examine three views on knowledge, teaching, and learning and to explore strategies to design learning activities reflective of current theories of teaching and learning.
Methods and/or Description of Project
This session will begin by examining the three primary models of teaching and learning: behavioral, cognitive or sociocultural. Behavioral theories position knowledge as external to the learner, and concepts must be assimilated through associations and breaking ideas down. Cognitive theories propose that knowledge is constructed by the learner through organization and connection of ideas. Sociocultural theories propose that knowledge is situated in contexts and that learning cannot be fully dissociated from the context. These theories have influenced elements of physical therapy education. We will present an example using the flipped classroom to demonstrate how a single educational innovation can be enacted in very different ways depending on the theoretical perspective of the teacher. A flipped classroom enacted from a behavioral perspective conveys very different learning goals than one enacted from a sociocultural or cognitive perspective. Students do not necessarily enter PT school prepared to be efficient adult learners. Instructors’ teaching strategies influence students’ approaches to learning. This session will provide activities for participants to reflect on their own teaching practices in order to identify strategies to better align their learning goals with instructional activities and assessments. Instructors who are aware of the theories they are practicing from can be more intentional in selecting means to achieve their teaching goals. Furthermore, increased awareness can enable instructors to critically analyze their theories and practices to move towards more effective instruction, educational goals, and outcomes. The final portion of the session will explore teaching strategies grounded in each of the theoretical perspectives to enable participants to intentionally design learning experiences that are most effective for their goals.
Developing knowledge of educational theories and strategies to develop as a reflective educator can lead to improved educational outcomes. Participants will gain an understanding of three educational perspectives: behavioral, cognitive and sociocultural as well as how these theories can support their teaching and assessment strategies to improve student outcomes. Participants will also develop strategies for analyzing existing teaching practices in order to make more informed choices for effective pedagogy. Sound pedagogy grounded in learning theories and more effective teaching strategies can lead to improved student learning and attitudes towards knowledge development and learning.
Conclusions/Relevance to the conference theme: The Pursuit of Excellence in Physical Therapy Education
The integration of theory in teaching enables physical therapy educators to be more intentional in their selection of teaching strategies based on their learning goals. Effective alignment of learning goals, teaching and assessment can enhance student learning and elevate the level of clinical practice of physical therapist students. Excellence in learning requires excellence in teaching. Excellent teaching must be informed by the broader body of knowledge in education.
Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57-75.
Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of learning science (pp. 47-60). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dai, D. Y. (2012). Design Research on Learning and Thinking in Educational Settings. New York: Routledge.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Macmillan.
Hodges, B. D., & Kuper, A. (2012). Theory and practice in the design and conduct of graduate medical education. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87(1), 25-33. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318238e069
Sandholtz, J. H., & Dadlez, S. H. (2000). Professional development school trade-offs in teacher preparation and renewal. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(1), 7-27.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schumacher, D. J., Englander, R., & Carraccio, C. (2013). Developing the master learner: applying learning theory to the learner, the teacher, and the learning environment. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 88(11), 1635-1645. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a6e8f8
Sims, R. (2012). Beyond instructional design: Making learning design a reality. Journal of Learning Design, 1(2), 1-9.
Stalmeijer, R. E., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Snellen-Balendong, H. A. M., van Santen-Hoeufft, M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2013). Clinical teaching based on principles of cognitive apprenticeship: views of experienced clinical teachers. Academic Medicine, 88(6), 861-865.
Strauss, S., Ravid, D., Magen, N., & Berliner, D. C. (1998). Relations between teachers' subject matter knowledge, teaching experience and their mental models of children's minds and learning. Teaching & Teacher Education, 14(6), 579-595.
van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.
Following this session, participants will:
Analyze their current teaching strategies to identify their primary models of learning
Evaluate innovations in teaching strategies in light of the theories in operation
Design more effective teaching strategies and innovations based on current learning theories
Lecture (overview of theories)
Application (illustration of teaching theories in action)
Reflection (questions for participants to analyze their own teaching)
Discussion and Problem Solving (exploration of ways to enhance participants’ own teaching)
Introduction: Impact of models of learning on knowledge development and teaching strategies (10 minutes)
Overview of theories of teaching and learning (15 minutes)
Case application: Teaching in a flipped classroom: Three perspectives on the same innovation (15 minutes)
Reflection questions for analysis of teaching and small group discussion (15 minutes)
Design of Teaching Strategies (activity and discussion): Using cognitive theories to drive active learning. Using sociocultural theory and the cognitive apprenticeship model to design situated learning. (20 minutes)